It was for the Union of Patriotic Resistance:
2. To explore ways and means to establish a joint military-political structure to bring a swift end to the occupation of the country and the uncontrolled exploitation of our natural resources.
· Recognizing that consequently our struggle is first and foremost a struggle for total liberation of the DRC from the grip of foreign occupation.
· Since the devastation of this occupation widespread province of our country.
· Driven by the desire patriotic urgency to free the people of the DRC from the horrors of the humiliating occupation of the country.
The National President of the UPR, Professor. Rev. Julien Ciakudia a, result of this consultation in London, supported the General Tshishimbi Lambert, Commander of the military wing of the movement, to take all practical steps necessary to support militarily, and urgently, the camp Patriots Resistance in Equateur province.
Thus the Political Directorate of the UPR has decided to walk together as Congolese Patriots Resistance against the occupying power in Kinshasa until the total liberation of our country.
Prof. Rev. Julien Ciakudia
National President
Union Patriots Resistance
Led by its President, Professor Julian Ciakudia, the delegation of the UPR was composed of four persons:
- Jeanne-Marie? Sindani, representative of the UPR in Germany and responsible for the organization of the Congolese diaspora in the movement
- Mr. Papy Ndombe, representing the movement in Holland
- Dr Didier Mukeba Tshialala representative for the Benelux
- And of course, Professor Ciakudia, coming from Great Britain, home of the movement.
During the interview we had with the delegation, this is what we have learned:
- The working session between resistant and Congolese officials of the Belgian Ministry of Foreign Affairs has lasted nearly two hours, from 15h30 to 17h15
- In their submission, delegates of the UPR have insisted on the ills currently besetting the Congo: Bad governance, insecurity, lack of rule of law, general decay, extreme poverty of the population.
- The UPR is responsible for leadership, not exclusive.
- The position of the Belgian Minister of Foreign Affairs joined the full sense of Congolese both domestically and abroad.
- The president of the UPR has attracted the attention of the Belgian camp on the increase of irreversible resistance movement in the Congolese public opinion.
To conclude their speeches, the patriots of the UPR have recalled this purely Congolese proverb: “Ata Ndele, mboka ekozongela biso!” Sooner or later, to the Congo … Congo!
Before leaving each to his country, the delegates from outside India have made a small turn at Matonge district of Brussels.
Rwanda: A tragic reality of a fascist ideology in a unipolar world
![]() |
| Jeanne-Marie Sindani |
The Democratic Republic of Congo is under occupation and killing at least 5.4 million deaths since the second war of invasion coalition of Tutsi Rwandan-Ugandan-Burundian? launched in early August 1998.
This second deadly invasion followed the first which was maliciously organized under the mantle of the Alliance, composed largely of soldiers and generals of the armed forces of three neighboring countries of Congo above. Formerly, some Congolese, including the late President Laurent Desire Kabila, General Ngandu Kisasse were seduced by Kagame and Museveni of a strategic and well calculated to hide the first three foreign invasion that broke out officially in September 1996.
In this context of a war of invasion called “Liberation”, it was therefore necessary to develop a more effective strategy, marked by misinformation and complete animated by a false campaign unparalleled in the world. He therefore had to be requisitioned from the war in Uganda, carefully planned and launched by the military elite Rwandan Tutsi in exile, after having ravaged Rwanda and Burundi and propelled the fugitives, among others, Congo-Zaire?, after the double murder of Rwandan presidents J. Habyarimana and his Burundian counterpart Cyprien Ntaryamira President April 6, 1994. This double murder that marks the tragic history of Rwanda-Urundi? and all of Central Africa is the result of a long war of invasion triggered by Rwandan Tutsi exiles who left their country in 1959 and formed the Patriotic Front Rwandans (RPF) in the late 80s to invade Rwanda from Uganda in early October 1990. This war has destabilized a large portion of sub-Saharan Africa with immeasurable consequences on all fronts! The horrors committed in Congo by the regular armies of the three neighboring countries of Congo and their militias are encouraged by impunity unusual and bewitching silence that dare not speak its name.
However, since the earliest times until today, the people of Congo, in particular, and those of Central Africa in general, are due no reproach in the conflict that ravaged Rwanda-Urundi? to the power sharing and equality among ethnic groups: Hutu majority (84%), Tutsi (14%) and Twa (1%) minority.
Several historians and missionaries who were undisputed witnesses and in some cases, co-actors in the history of Rwanda, supported by many stories and testimonies of Rwandans themselves, as Antoine Nyeta in its report submitted to the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda Arusha (2001-2002) entitled: “The truth of the Hutu-Tutsi? conflict, clearly certify that the causes of the Rwandan tragedy are looking at the Rwandans themselves, especially among traditional leaders Tutsi (the BAMIS or Mwami ) well before the independence of Rwanda.
In its report, Nyeta explains at length how the Tutsi dynasty was infiltrated in the aristocratic power Hutu, then moved and continued until the late 50s, after having overthrown and massacred the Hutu principalities background. Indeed, regarding the origin of the aristocratic Tutsi in Rwanda and Burundi, Archbishop Julian Gorju (1938) states, after conducting thorough investigations to the princes of the dynasty Hamitic Tutsi therefore, that: “There are princes facies which is the pure Bantu. We trouble to name names among the old and new. In short, taken altogether, our princes are less Hamites (Tutsi) that the simple shepherds and when they appear, this should probably be attributed to unions repeated incessantly in the stock Hamite. “In this regard, Antony declares Nyeta that the Tutsi monarchy had “resorted to all sorts of tricks, alliances and schemes to establish authority and subjugate the rest of the social components considered, therefore, as subjects corveables to thank you. A system of education and socialization was then introduced: the myth of superior intelligence component of the Tutsi and his predestination to rule others is instilled in the population. This is the system are the Germans who first settled all that is now Rwanda and Burundi. “
Administrators and missionaries Germans have therefore strengthened the system of domination and enslavement of Hutus by the Tutsi, a system of racial segregation and exploitation based on caste hierarchy and a single power – radical ethnic directed exclusively by the Tutsi .
About infiltration Tutsi aristocratic power in Hutu Gorju Bishop (1938) noted after observing the new dynasty established the Rwanda Tutsi, he said about princes Hamites that: “Their customs are in support of their claims. Their Prisoners are always among the peasants. A prince, when he marries a girl Mututsi (ie Tutsi), performs ceremonies in a hut of a Hutu (then Hutu), formed specifically for this by Hutu, in a kraal of Hutu. When Prince feels death approaching, he carried into the hut of one of its Hutu to die. “Thus, to reveal the lies propagated by the new Tutsi oligarchy, Bishop Gorju quoted the great leader who had said Nduwumwe loud and clear: “Do not misunderstand our origin; us princes, our first ancestor was Hutu, we are only Hutu.” Such an assertion in a country where one worships a lie and a time was “noble” than what was required of Tutsi leader Nduwumwe a certain attachment to the truth. (Gorju, John Bishop, 1938: “Facing the Hamitic kingdom of Rwanda, the kingdom of Urundi brother,” Library of the Congo, NS Nr.3, Brussels, 1938).
After the Second World War (1940-1945), the Belgian mandate received from the international community to lead the Rwanda-Urundi?. The Belgians continued the system introduced by the Germans. The Tutsi are overwhelmingly supported in their practice of enslavement of Hutus. Since at least 1922, a true racial segregation worked in Rwanda-Urundi? at the primary level. Later, the instructions of Bishop Leo class to different missions in Rwanda are particularly clear: “The school Batutsi must take precedence over the Hutu (.) It prepares us for the future by winning the future leaders, winning the parents and the government () must tender the school Mututsi is in its local as Tutsi. (Class, Archbishop Leo, 1922: “Rwanda and its people.”) Meanwhile, the Hutu, regarded as the mass of deer and slaves, languished under the dominance of the Tutsi aristocracy supported by the Belgian colonists.
However, in 1957, Hutu prepare a memorandum on the claims called “Hutu Manifesto”, they make especially to the Belgian Minister of Colonies and the Trusteeship Council of the United Nations. The manifesto calls. “The division of lands, the abolition of large estates (Ibikingi) which became the years of grazing properties and only Tutsi, Hutu participation in local administration, etc. In short, the” Hutu Manifesto “presented the problem Hutu Tutsi-in these terms: “The question Htu-Tutsi? problem is the no. 1 to Rwanda, because it challenges the very existence of the group numerically higher on the one hand, and the group economically and politically superior to the other. That’s life even of the Rwandan people is at stake here (Hutu 84%, Tutsi 15%, Twa 1%). “The Manifesto thus claiming de facto equality of all citizens of the country by establishing a democratic system such as to ensure maximum every citizen is equal before the rights, duties, honors and charges and a political and administrative structure in which the privileges of caste are banned, to ensure to all citizens, without discrimination, equal opportunity in the assumption of all public and especially in management positions.
The United Nations had received petitions Hutu and was worried about the unequal situation of Rwanda-Urundi?. Thus, the Mission report tackles head for the first time, the Hutu-Tutsi? problem, hitherto systematically denied by the Tutsi leaders and downplayed by the Belgian colonial administration. The UN report criticizes the very foundations of Belgian politics in the territory of Rwanda-Urundi?. In paragraph 45 of its report, the UN stressed the urgency of a move towards making possible and hasten the emancipation of the Hutu. The UN said in part: “This marks a large extent the end of the danger of exploitation by the Bantu Farmers Hamitic pastoralists, but pose other problems equally distressing And as expected the notables of the court of Mwami (king of the Tutsi of Rwanda) were the first to protest against the demands of the Hutu. They declared plainly that they did not share power with the Hutus that they were not brothers, but their slaves!
According to Antoine Nyeta, Mwami Tutsi and notable “recalled first that they were descendants of the sky (ibimanuka) or anunaki race of giants, Anak and” they did not fellowship with land. These statements notables and Mwami Tutsi recall what is written in the ancient books of mankind before the flood. The book of Enoch and the Sumerians manuscripts included in the Old Testament speak clearly of the race of giants who have spread violence on the ground, the nephilim from nature cons of unions between women of humans and fallen angels. It is quite possible that significant Tutsi based their statements on their remarkable stature, their thirst for power consuming, the malice, the cult of lies and character warrior very violent and perverted. To mark their convictions and their determination, the opinion of the notables of the Tutsi king was signed by eleven of them (abagaragu cumi na Babili b’ibwami). Nyet further asserts that: “They (the leaders) recommended the Mwami (King) did not allow the sharing of large estates with the Hutu and the Hutu proposed that rather go and live in Gishari Mokoto Kivu, Congo where they need land. “
Intolerance and intransigence of the Tutsi oligarchy has set the tone for the events that shook the Rwanda-Urundi? since many years: The Petitioners and Hutus were convicted and accused of “separatism” and considered “divisive” d ‘Inyangarwanda, that is to say, “enemies of Rwanda.” Thus, the Higher National Council of 9 to 12 June 1958 who had received the social question Hutu-Tutsi?, ended with a contemptuous rejection of claims Hutu. And before going to Brussels where he was invited to the International Exhibition of 1958, the Mwami Mutara III Rudahigwa uttered threats against the Hutu: “The promoters of such crimes can not hide, and if the thing is Again, the tree that produces these fruits, I extirpated “
Despite the intimidation Mwami Mutara III UN that watched Rwanda-Urundi? is developing democratic institutions of power resulting from free elections and political parties. The Hutu formed the Association for the Promotion Sociale de la Masse (Aprosoma) Party and the Movement for the Emancipation Hutu (PARMEHUTU), while the Tutsis formed the Rwandan National Union (UNAR). In November 1959, during a popular vote that gave birth to the ‘Social Revolution’, the caste hierarchy and the aristocracy of the Tutsi were abolished. The Tutsi king was deposed. In this context, at the behest of UNaR which aims to retain power, wave disturbances Rwanda. The Tutsi attack the Belgians who they accuse of failing to prevent the Hutu from claiming their rights. The UNaR sent a circular letter to all heads and deputy head Tutsi aimed at ending the activities of the Hutu parties.
Hutus are hounded and harassed in the streets and public markets. The UNaR distributes leaflets urging Hutus to murder. In one of the leaflets that read: “Banyarwanda, let us unite, look at all costs these enemies of Rwanda and their offspring in Rwanda and exterminate all those bad seeds. Forward Banyarwanda careful, snakes exterminate these enemies of Rwanda. “These violent attacks on the leaders of political parties Hutu by Tutsi Unare provoked a violent response Hutu.
The Belgian para-commandos have intervened to stop the unrest and the culprits were arrested. Some chiefs and headmen Tutsi who had carried out massive attacks were also arrested, and others took the road of exile to Uganda, Congo, Tanzania and Burundi. The internal autonomy was granted in 1960, but the independence of Rwanda-Urundi? was only proclaimed in 1962. On October 26, 1962, Grégoire Kayibanda was first elected Hutu president of Rwanda as a sovereign state. However, democratic elections did not bring no peace to Rwanda. All efforts towards Tutsis no avail. They refused to be led by a Hutu president: MPs, ministers and managers, medical assistants, veterinarians, agronomists and some teachers resigned. They took the path of exile, at the same time, those who remained Unare indulged in acts of sabotage and to hunt Hutu PARMEHUTU and Aprosoma. Unare of exiles in neighboring countries were making incursions into Rwanda to murder mayors, municipal police officers, deputies, accountants and even ordinary citizens. The Tutsi rebels christened themselves “Inyenzi” abbreviation of “Ingangurarugo Ziyemeje Kuba Inyenzi. Ingangurarugo reminded the king’s militia Kigeri IV Ziyemeje means determined; Kuba means be; Inyenzi means a cockroach, an insect that swarms, which occurs very quickly, attack at night and broods quickly and cleverly hides. Nyet confirms that this is not the Hutu who gave them the name of inyenzi (cockroach), but themselves. The Rwandan Patriotic Front took the name “Inkotani” which means “bitter Wrestlers” who started the war of 1990 marked a brutal return to Rwanda-Urundi?. Causing a double genocide of Rwandan Hutu, Tutsi and Twa.
The war of invasion of Rwanda in Congo is a war that is beyond the design of a regular armed conflict. It is mostly a war of diametrically opposed forces or spirits that compete through the militia led by a fascist ideology and hegemony that enormous sacrifice human lives, looting Congo’s resources and destroying the nature and ecosystem the Congo basin shortly after the fall of the Berlin Wall.
This savage fascist ideology, promoted by a destructive force immeasurably from Rwanda, Congo ravaged through the wars of invasion of Rwandan Tutsi. This ideology is based on false propaganda repugnant supported blind foreign powers and causing de facto falsification of history, a fact that was established in Rwanda-Urundi?, and gradually expanding to breakneck speed in the Congo, passing a pretext to another to maintain the insecurity and seize power by armed violence, the ongoing killings of Congolese elite, systematic rape of women of all ages; malicious infiltration of Rwanda to the strategic command posts at all levels; the terror lies, misinformation infernal, the selling off of all the Congolese national resources; deception, impunity and corruption introduced by the wild Rwandan are charged to power in Congo since January 2001. The Rwandan invasions in Congo have started a total chaos in Central Africa and the use of extraordinary violence that threatens the existence of an entire people. The Congolese population is directly threatened with extermination. The Congolese people must be aware of this danger and they must therefore mobilize to demand and obtain the resignation of the occupying power based in Kinshasa as soon as possible and put an end to the ideology of Rwanda on Congolese soil. There will be no real peace without due.










